New research shows that ocean turbulence directly affects the ability of microscopic marine organisms to recycle organic material back into the food web.
Results of the study are published in this week's issue of the journal Science.
Scientists John Taylor of Cambridge University and Roman Stocker at MIT found that there's a relationship between the natural movement of water in the ocean and the ability of marine bacteria to act as recyclers.
"The research provides a unique insight into how small organisms, such as bacteria, interact with their environment," says biological oceanographer David Garrison of the National Science Foundation's Division of Ocean Sciences, which funded the research.
"The results will lead to a better understanding of microbial dynamics and nutrient cycling in nature."
The movement of seawater--including small whirls and eddies--affects how marine bacteria absorb organic material, such as that produced by phytoplankton.
In the process of generating oxygen, phytoplankton produce waste matter in the form of organic material, some of which becomes dissolved in seawater.
This dissolved organic material is then absorbed by marine bacteria foraging for food. Bacteria are then consumed by larger organisms.
The organic waste material excreted by phytoplankton becomes part of the microbial loop - and contributes to the functioning of the marine food web.
Taylor's and Stocker's research revealed that a delicate balance exists between the extent of water turbulence and the recycling activity of bacteria--with high and low levels of turbulence linked to lower recycling rates.
Their study also looked at how the physical environment of the ocean might help to select the most successful types of marine bacteria, which compete for nutrients.
Some marine bacteria have evolved the ability to swim. Swimming bacteria, known as motile bacteria, have advantages over non-swimming species in foraging for food.
However, swimming is energy-intensive so motile bacteria swim only when it is worth the effort in terms of pay-back.
Some bacteria can also detect and respond to chemicals dissolved in the surrounding water, an ability known as chemotaxis.
The researchers compared the activity of motile and non-motile bacteria across environments that differed in levels of water movement and nutrient availability.
All water moves, but the extent of its turbulence varies widely in the ocean.
Wind and waves strongly churn the water near the surface, while the level of turbulence is much lower in the deep ocean, says Stocker.
The results show that the organic matter excreted by phytoplankton is patchy in the ocean, and is not as uniform as had been thought.
Organic matter enters water in bursts, after which a natural mixing and stirring action comes into play and the organic matter is dispersed.
The patterns of dispersal depend on the strength of turbulence and the extent of stirring and mixing.
"When you pour cream into coffee and stir it carefully, you get swirls of cream," says Taylor.
"Something similar happens when bursts of organic matter enter gently moving water. The swirls of organic matter are easily accessed by swimming bacteria which surround and absorb it.
"If you mix cream into your coffee vigorously, it quickly becomes evenly dispersed. When this happens in the ocean, the swimming bacteria have less to gain in seeking out the thinly-dispersed organic matter."
Bacteria get energy from organic matter--but they also expend energy in swimming.
"Our research suggests that the optimum environment is one of intermediate turbulence intensity--when bursts of organic matter are stirred into thin filaments that can be exploited by large numbers of bacteria," says Taylor.
"The best environment for motile bacteria is one in which the organic matter is lightly stirred into the water rather than vigorously mixed."
National Science Foundation: http://www.nsf.gov
This press release was posted to serve as a topic for discussion. Please comment below. We try our best to only post press releases that are associated with peer reviewed scientific literature. Critical discussions of the research are appreciated. If you need help finding a link to the original article, please contact us on twitter or via e-mail.
Claims that Ai Hin was faking pregnancy to get better treatment have been debunked by leading panda expert
The recent release of Susan Greenfields new book and the film Lucy, both of which are dependent on tired misconceptions or dubious theories about the brain, suggest one worrying conclusion: we are running out of myths about the brain. So here are some new ones, to keep things mysterious
These are the siphonophores, some 180 known species of gelatinous strings that can grow to 100 feet long, making them some of the longest critters on the planet. But instead of growing as a single body like virtually every other animal, siphonophores clone themselves thousands of times over into half a dozen different types of specialized cloned bodies, all strung together to work as a team---a very deadly team at that.
Researchers who study memory have had a thrilling couple of years. Some have erased memories in people with electroshock therapy, for example. Others have figured out, in mice, how to create false memories and even turn bad memories into good ones.
Hunting bats don't just listen out for male frogs' mating calls: they can also use echolocation to detect when the frogs inflate their throat sacs
A crèche of 30 dinosaur infants looked over by an older animal shows that even terrible lizards needed a night away from the kids
Families have identifiable collections of microbes that travel with them. It can take just 24 hours for the microbes to take over a new house
When rabbits were domesticated, around 100 regions of their genome changed to make them less fearful, but the variations are not fixed
Scientists never understood what became of the Paleo-Eskimos who once peopled the north. Now they know—and there's new reason to miss them
NOAA whittles down initial list of 66 species to be covered by Endangered Species Act