The reason why Butler and Nature Magazine editors undertook this article we have now found out is because they were doing the dirty work of the large pharma. Indeed, when they contacted one of our vice-presidents Nobel laureate Robert Huber, professor Huber was misled by Butler and thought that he was alluding to another institution. Indeed, Prof. Huber had undertaken a trip to Brazil for the WIF and was involved with some of the WIF's Fellows from Germany. Other areas were speculation without foundation but where the main reason was that big pharma did not want the alternative strategy to emerge of defeating bird flu et al at source, as there was not the tens of billion of dollars in drugs if this strategy were adopted (and might I add the only strategy that will work against this eventual global killer that will go into 100s of million of deaths worldwide). For the article was very well timed for release and to coincide exactly with the release of this alternative strategy at an international conference on bird flu in Thailand in January 2008 - http://avian-influenza.cirad.fr/content/download/1931/11789/file/Kennedy-F-Shortridge.pdf.

For on the same day that the keynote speech was made, the article appeared in Nature. Coincidence, I do not think so and where Nature Magazine is in the back pocket of the giant pharmaceutical groups we have now determined and most probably the back pocket of all powerful organizations.

We shall see what further emerges, but other coincidental undeniable facts are that Butler is a very good friend of the main WHO adviser that recommended the use of the predominately useless vaccines. Coincidences again, I don’t think so.

Dr David Hill
Executive Director
World Innovation Foundation Charity
Bern, Switzerland