You are not using a standards compliant browser. Because of this you may notice minor glitches in the rendering of this page. Please upgrade to a compliant browser for optimal viewing:
Internet Explorer 7
Safari (Mac and PC)
Post Archive
2020 (0)2012 (1)2011 (36)
November (1)October (3)August (3)July (6)June (3)May (4)April (4)March (4)February (4)January (4)
Rate This Post
Total votes: 5
Blogger Profile

Dangerous Experiments

Dangerous Experiments is the LabSpaces spot for guest bloggers. The purpose of the blog is to give new and old bloggers a space to experiment with blogging. If you'd like to contribute to this experiment, send us an e-mail or contact us on twitter at either @LSBlogs or @LabSpaces.

My posts are presented as opinion and commentary and do not represent the views of LabSpaces Productions, LLC, my employer, or my educational institution.

Blog RSS Feed
RSS Add to My Yahoo Add to Google
Recent Comments

Interestingly, I knew that this was the kind of work I wanted to do as soon as I heard about it. I had always loved both science and art, growing up. I didn't realize I could have a job that reache. . .Read More
Jan 08, 2013, 7:58pm

Thank you for writing Monika, and for your curiosity about this line of work. There are many reasons to be drawn to this profession, and there are many subspecialties. Aside from the lov. . .Read More
Jan 08, 2013, 7:50pm

Laura,  I am currently a student at Penn State University, and i am focused in the Visual Arts area. I was wondering about specificating my talent into medical illustration because of my p. . .Read More
Jan 08, 2013, 7:24pm

We here at approve of this post because it has our name in it. That is all... Actually that's not all. There's more! Here's a pic of a raccoon carying a. . .Read More
Nov 15, 2012, 3:04pm

Melissa, I too am fairly optimistic about the FSMA, which has great implications for the future of the lab testing industry. Although my company doesn't do food testing in particular, we have . . .Read More
Aug 15, 2012, 5:07pm
Monday, January 31, 2011

This week's guest blogger is Waddell Robey. He has eighteen years of aerospace engineering and management experience and thirty plus years in health and human services research.  He is a strong space exploration activist and maintains a steady commentary on Twitter as XiNeutrino and through direct mailings to NASA leadership.  He has  several blogs devoted to space exploration.  His philosophy is that we are here to explore, and in exploring we discover, and in discovering we seek to explain, and in explaining we enrich that which we call science.


Space elevator schema Credit: Booyabazooka/CC2.0

Introduce a topic about space elevators within a group of space travel enthusiasts and you will usually get a variety of reactions from eye-rolls, to snickers, to nods of acceptance and interest. Although there is continuing encouragement, especially from NASA, for design research into the total space elevator concept, there remains several critical areas that pose serious barriers. One of the most important and the most challenging to address is the exposure of the space elevator to intense radiation.

Anchored to an ocean platform on the equator and to a geo-synchronous space terminal 100,000 kilometers above the Earth, the space elevator, driven by high-powered lasers, rises along a carbon-nanotubular1 ribbon to its space terminal. Sounds dramatic and fascinating; and it is.

In the course of its travel, the space elevator will pass through the Van Allen Belts2. The belts are a space travel hazard. It is dangerous when systems and humans are directly exposed to their radiation. This would certainly be the case for the passengers, cargo and the space-elevator itself. Yes, Lunar bound astronauts passed through the belts, but at a speed that sharply reduced the length of time of their exposure. High-speed passage through the belts by the space-elevator is currently not an option. If it were, travel could be like this description.

The Van Allen radiation belts Credit: NASA
Well, what about radiation shielding? Research into space radiation is extensive and ongoing3. The key motivation is determining how best to protect astronauts, their cargo and their spacecraft from radiation damage. Prospects of extended human spaceflight missions across our solar system are strong and solving the radiation shielding problem is high on the list of research programs. These efforts can only be of benefit to an eventual space-elevator program.

Although there is no specific research into radiation shielding for a space-elevator system, there are two shielding concepts that are examples of the kind of shielding technology that may work. At MIT, researchers have developed and experimental model of a shielding system based upon superconducting magnet technology4. Research in this area began during the early start of this century and is still relatively new. In addition to creating a strong magnetic shield the MIT system is designed to require low energy input. Additionally, when under relatively stable temperature conditions the magnetic field can be maintained for long periods of time. These two latter factors, low energy requirements and sustained activation have significance for any space-elevator program.

Artist's concept of a functioning space elevator Credit:

The other potential shielding system is based upon asymmetric electrostatic shielding5. Applied research to spacecraft shielding also began in the early part of this century. Of the two, this is the least desirable application for space-elevators. This is due to the required high energy support as well as a unique balloon array. The array of balloons is differentially charged and thus provides shielding of various particle charges as well as cosmic radiation. This could be a cumbersome and actually limited shielding approach. Regardless, the research into the application of this shielding concept can be of value for eventual shield-system designs for space-elevators.

Yes, it is certain that many, who regard the idea of space elevators as unlikely space transport systems, will still regard the open radiation shielding issues as high priority for major spacecraft design. They would just consider that there would be limited or no planned application for space-elevators. This understandable position does affect funding and program support for specific shielding research as applied to potential space-elevator operations.

Returning to the topic of this article, can we presume that space-elevator systems design will progress and need serious design solutions for radiation shielding? A broad review6 of the progress in overall design efforts of this space transport system supports an affirmative response.

Long before the radiation issue is critical, the overall system must overcome other major hurdles such as safety from space junk, safety from violent Earth weather events, and the proven functional safety of the nanotube ribbon. Additionally, the power systems that support the laser propulsion technology must be powerful enough to also support some form of radiation shielding. Lastly, the entire package must be designed in a compact and weight sensitive manner if the space-elevator is to achieve its 13+ ton cargo/passenger lift capacity.

My vote would be for a dream that is rapidly approaching reality. What is yours?


1Carbon nanotubes:
2Van Allen Belt:
3Space radiation research:
4MIT Superconducting Magnet Technology:
Asymmetric Electrostatic Radiation Shields:
6Space-Elevator Conference and Data:

This post has been viewed: 10042 time(s)

Blog Comments

Brian Krueger, PhD
Columbia University Medical Center
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Are there any estimateson when this technology might be viable?

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Wow- very cool article, and easy to read.

Instead of shielding the radiation, there must be a way to cancel it our or neutralize it. Or what if you could block it by slowing down the radiation (instead of speeding the passengers up)?


Steve York

Guest Comment

Nice overview of oft-neglected issues in space elevator design.


It's worth mentioning that while a human-capable elevator is an ideal end-goal, there are other way-points that might support construction and improvement of the system until that ideal (assuming it's possible) can be reached.  Low-cost transport of radiation-tolerant payloads to and from orbit still might be a viable economic application, and providing sufficient radiation protection for more sensitive (but smaller-volume) payloads may be a way of developing and proving systems that might be applied to humans.


Guest Comment

The original reason for a space elevator was the suppression of the first stage of typical rocket systems. The first stage of a rocket system operates only up to the Karman line (+/- 100 km/70 miles). Due to its operational requirements a centrifugal CNT tether needs to be extended up to a GEO distance and along the way going through the Van Allen belt.

There is another system that can do the trick of eliminating altogether the use of a first rocket stage and is that of a SpaceShaft. Although its general appearance is that of a column this is not a space tower but an elevator system. The reason why this is not a tower is because the whole structure is constantly moving upwards due to constant accumulation of upthrust from buoyancy throughout the dense regions of the atmosphere, allowing the system to rise thousands of tonnes instead of tens of tonnes.

To see pictures of the proposed system and for a better description of the mechanism visit


Add Comment?
Comments are closed 2 weeks after initial post.