You are not using a standards compliant browser. Because of this you may notice minor glitches in the rendering of this page. Please upgrade to a compliant browser for optimal viewing:
Internet Explorer 7
Safari (Mac and PC)
Post Archive
2020 (0)
2012 (1)2011 (36)
November (1)October (3)August (3)July (6)June (3)May (4)April (4)March (4)February (4)January (4)
Rate This Post
Total votes: 2
Blogger Profile

Dangerous Experiments

Dangerous Experiments is the LabSpaces spot for guest bloggers. The purpose of the blog is to give new and old bloggers a space to experiment with blogging. If you'd like to contribute to this experiment, send us an e-mail or contact us on twitter at either @LSBlogs or @LabSpaces.

My posts are presented as opinion and commentary and do not represent the views of LabSpaces Productions, LLC, my employer, or my educational institution.

Blog RSS Feed
RSS Add to My Yahoo Add to Google
Recent Comments

Interestingly, I knew that this was the kind of work I wanted to do as soon as I heard about it. I had always loved both science and art, growing up. I didn't realize I could have a job that reache. . .Read More
Jan 08, 2013, 7:58pm

Thank you for writing Monika, and for your curiosity about this line of work. There are many reasons to be drawn to this profession, and there are many subspecialties. Aside from the lov. . .Read More
Jan 08, 2013, 7:50pm

Laura,  I am currently a student at Penn State University, and i am focused in the Visual Arts area. I was wondering about specificating my talent into medical illustration because of my p. . .Read More
Jan 08, 2013, 7:24pm

We here at approve of this post because it has our name in it. That is all... Actually that's not all. There's more! Here's a pic of a raccoon carying a. . .Read More
Nov 15, 2012, 3:04pm

Melissa, I too am fairly optimistic about the FSMA, which has great implications for the future of the lab testing industry. Although my company doesn't do food testing in particular, we have . . .Read More
Aug 15, 2012, 5:07pm
Monday, May 23, 2011

This week's guest blogger is Ben Still.  He's a postdoctoral researcher at the Particle Physics Research Centre Queen Mary, University of London.  He can be found on twitter @benstill.


Last week around 150 scientists travelled to Japan to not only discuss exciting new physics but also how to re-build one of the biggest experiments on the planet. The Tokai to Kamioka (T2K) experiment is an international collaboration of around 500 scientists and engineers in total, from 12 different countries. We are using neutrinos, the smallest and most ghostly building blocks of nature, in an attempt to understand a major chapter in the creation story of the Universe.

The Meeting

Many of the participants of the meeting were retracing steps they took just months earlier when evacuating Japan after the March 11th earthquake. The quake devastated much of the north-eastern Japanese seaboard and with it the Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex (J-PARC), the base of the T2K experiment. J-PARC itself was too damaged in the quake to host a meeting and so the venue was changed to the sister particle physics site KEK in Tsukuba, Japan.

Apart from a different location, and the background of aftershocks still resonating through the country, the meeting went as usual. Three days of pre-meetings where every aspect of the experiment was discussed in detail. Following this, three days of plenary in which all progress since the last meeting in December 2010 and plans for the future were discussed.

The Experiment

Neutrinos interact extremely rarely with anything around them, so rarely that on the T2K experiment we fire an intense beam of them 295km directly through the Earth from the East to West of Japan. Why do this? Neutrinos display a crisis of character. They are born as a certain type in conjunction with a charged particle, E.g. an electron-neutrino and electron, but sometime later may be seen to have changed their type. This change of character is known as neutrino oscillation. It is a well known and explained effect that happens in the very small ‘quantum’ world.

The T2K experiment hopes for the first time to directly see a change of muon-neutrino to electron-neutrino (the muon is the heavier cousin of the electron, same in almost every way just heavier). Once measured then scientists can start to understand the interplay between neutrinos and their anti-matter versions, anti-neutrinos.

The Science Bit

When experiments are conducted in the lab new particles can be created from pure energy, thanks to Einstein’s E=mc2 equation. The new mass (m) created is however always seen to be a 1:1 mix of matter and anti-matter. This is a problem. Matter and anti-matter inevitably meet again, because opposites attract, and annihilate each other when they do to form pure energy once more. If the 1:1 ratio were perfectly true then the Universe, thought to have started in a pure energy Big Bang, would today be nothing but a warm bath of energy – microwaves in fact. But we are not – us, the Earth and the entire visible Universe out there is made from matter.

Natures Lego set of 12 basic building block. (diagram made myself)

So where has the excess matter come from? At some level this 1:1 ratio (symmetry) is flawed (asymmetric). The flaw has been well measured when using just quark particles. Due to the ghostly nature of the neutrino the same flaw has not been measured yet using the other six particles that make up Natures Lego set – the Leptons. By measuring the character crisis of the neutrino T2K hopes to allow us to measure the imbalance between Leptons and anti-Leptons.

After the March quake the particle accelerator, detector and other essential systems were heavily damaged. A plan was discussed during last weeks meeting and people are optimistic that given the right support the experiment may be back and taking data in early 2012.

In the meantime the experiment hopes to present new results in the upcoming summer conferences. Once back on track the T2K experiment will rapidly improve the precision to which we understand the neutrino, and may yield the answer to the creation of the visible Universe.

This post has been viewed: 987 time(s)

Blog Comments
No comments recorded.
Add Comment?
Comments are closed 2 weeks after initial post.