banner
You are not using a standards compliant browser. Because of this you may notice minor glitches in the rendering of this page. Please upgrade to a compliant browser for optimal viewing:
Firefox
Internet Explorer 7
Safari (Mac and PC)
Post Archive
2017 (0)2012 (1)2011 (36)
November (1)October (3)August (3)July (6)June (3)May (4)April (4)March (4)February (4)January (4)
Rate This Post
Total votes: 1
Blogger Profile

Dangerous Experiments

Dangerous Experiments is the LabSpaces spot for guest bloggers. The purpose of the blog is to give new and old bloggers a space to experiment with blogging. If you'd like to contribute to this experiment, send us an e-mail or contact us on twitter at either @LSBlogs or @LabSpaces.

My posts are presented as opinion and commentary and do not represent the views of LabSpaces Productions, LLC, my employer, or my educational institution.

Blog RSS Feed
RSS Add to My Yahoo Add to Google
Recent Comments

Interestingly, I knew that this was the kind of work I wanted to do as soon as I heard about it. I had always loved both science and art, growing up. I didn't realize I could have a job that reache. . .Read More
Jan 08, 2013, 7:58pm

Thank you for writing Monika, and for your curiosity about this line of work. There are many reasons to be drawn to this profession, and there are many subspecialties. Aside from the lov. . .Read More
Jan 08, 2013, 7:50pm

Laura,  I am currently a student at Penn State University, and i am focused in the Visual Arts area. I was wondering about specificating my talent into medical illustration because of my p. . .Read More
Jan 08, 2013, 7:24pm

We here at Geekation.com approve of this post because it has our name in it. That is all... Actually that's not all. There's more! Here's a pic of a raccoon carying a. . .Read More
Nov 15, 2012, 3:04pm

Melissa, I too am fairly optimistic about the FSMA, which has great implications for the future of the lab testing industry. Although my company doesn't do food testing in particular, we have . . .Read More
Aug 15, 2012, 5:07pm
Sunday, October 23, 2011

 

You know what they say about people with big brains... 

Big Facebook friends lists. 

That's not entirely true. But a new study in Proceedings of the Royal Society B has neuroscience junkies abuzz this week: the number of Facebook friends we have may be linked to certain brain structures.

Now, let's not get too worked up about this. I'll cover what we know from this study, but it's not too earth-shattering (that, or my modest brain fears being dwarfed by my more popular colleagues' extensive networks—social and neural, alike). 

Current studies in social networking are growing exponentially and, in my opinion, are not money wasted. Facebook boasts 800 million active users, half of whom log onto the site everyday. Between users, these networks vary—from modest lists of close companions to scrolls of over 1,000 "friends" (come on, really?). Are these online networks correlated with real-life connections? For most, maybe—but for some, probably not. More importantly, though, do these online networks have some sort of basis in the brain? 

Kanai and colleagues at University College London collected MRI scans and Facebook activity-related questionnaires from 125 individuals and noted some interesting correlations. In these individuals, the more Facebook friends they had, the denser their grey matter in three regions of the brain: left middle temporal gyrus, right superior temporal sulcus, and entorhinal cortex (a, b, and c below). Ignore the Greek: just know that these structures are implicated in memory and social perception. 


Not the most convincing R value, but the correlation is there. 

To make sure that the number of Facebook friends actually correlates with real-life social connections in these participants, the researchers collected some additional measures. Take my word on this: for the most part, lots of Facebook friends = lots of real-life interactions. Some of the measures were kind of LOL-able, hence my re-posting their figure: 


Pho = number of friends in phonebook, Par = invitations to a party, number of friends outside (OS) and inside (IS) school, presence at a birthday party (BD), text messages received for a "celebratory event" (Txt), meetings for a chat (Cha), or number of people asked for a favor (Fav). These are all plotted to see correlations with FBN (Facebook number). The little stars denote a correlation between number of Facebook friends and that particular social measure. 

This study doesn't tell us much beyond what I stated. Are people with more developed connections (namely, denser grey matter) in these social and memory-related brain areas born this way, or do they develop them over the years as their number of real-life social interactions grow? 


If not, maybe we should all be putting down the books and relying on Facebook to make our brains bigger. Sounds like a safe bet to me, right? 


Photos courtesy Labnol and Failbook.  

Kanai R, Bahrami B, Roylance R, & Rees G (2011). Online social network size is reflected in human brain structure.Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society PMID: 220129


This post was contributed by Jordan Gaines of Gaines, on Brains. Follow on Twitter @GainesOnBrains.

This post has been viewed: 1540 time(s)

Tags:           

Blog Comments
No comments recorded.
Add Comment?
Comments are closed 2 weeks after initial post.
Friends