banner
You are not using a standards compliant browser. Because of this you may notice minor glitches in the rendering of this page. Please upgrade to a compliant browser for optimal viewing:
Firefox
Internet Explorer 7
Safari (Mac and PC)
Post Archive
2012 (13)2011 (7)
Rate This Post
Total votes: 1
Blogger Profile

Jordan Gaines
Neuroscience
Pennsylvania State University USA

neuroBLOGical (n.): a blog on biology, psychology, cognition, learning, memory, aging, and everything in between. Explaining the brain to science lovers and non-lovers, the literate to the laymen!

My posts are presented as opinion and commentary and do not represent the views of LabSpaces Productions, LLC, my employer, or my educational institution.

Blog RSS Feed
RSS Add to My Yahoo Add to Google
Recent Comments
Comment by yannisguerra in My MRI experience

It is interesting the internal bias that I have. Seeing mostly elderly patients or sick people, I looked at your MRI and said to myself Why does it look weird? Then I realized that it looks. . .Read More
May 24, 2012, 6:16pm
Comment by Mohammadbagher in Science: why I do it AND write it

New Reader ! Amazing  ,they always scared me!   A research assistant  . . .Read More
May 20, 2012, 3:36am

35 years after "Dress for Success" was published, someone finally decided to do some research on why? This has been known for centuries in some circles, ie the military. The uniforms are selected t. . .Read More
Apr 27, 2012, 7:07pm
Comment by Jordan Gaines in Science: why I do it AND write it

Thank you Mickey! And thanks for reading! . . .Read More
Apr 26, 2012, 12:15pm
Comment by Mickey Schafer in Science: why I do it AND write it

Long time reader, first time commenter -- thank you for writing this. And Happy Birthday!! . . .Read More
Apr 25, 2012, 8:22am
Blogroll
Feb 01, 2011, 10:42am
Jan 07, 2011, 2:16pm
Monday, November 28, 2011

Sir, I wanna buy these shoes for my mama, please. It's Christmas Eve and these shoes are just her size. Could you hurry, sir? Daddy says there's not much time...

This little gem by New Song permeates the airwaves each year around this time, igniting tears and snickers alike in its listeners. We all know why the man agrees to buy the shoes for the boy—I mean, "his clothes were worn and old, he was dirty from head to toe." But how much would he be willing to part with for this anonymous child—$20? $30? $100? According to a study, the sadder the man, the more he would be willing to pay.

In a 2008 Psychological Science study, researchers at Carnegie Mellon, Stanford, Harvard, and Pitt explored the connection between sadness and buying. Participants viewed either a sad video (a scene of the death of a boy's mentor, from The Champ) or a neutral, emotionless clip (a National Geographic video on the Great Barrier Reef).

Afterward, participants had the option of buying an ordinary commodity—a water bottle. Those that had previously viewed the sad clip were willing to pay, on average, 300% more for the bottle than those who viewed the neutral clip. Furthermore, the "sad" group insisted that the content of their clip—watching the boy's sadness—did not affect their willingness to pay the amount they chose.

The authors reason the sad clip caused those participants to devalue both their sense of self and current possessions, making them willing to pay for new material possessions. Presumably, this would re-enhance their sense of self.

It is important to note that this was a modest study of empathy in the form of short video clips. The impact of truly intense sadness could lead to dangerous or risky spending behavior—perhaps even translating to domains beyond money, such as seeking new relationships.

According to co-author James Gross, "people can't and shouldn't go shopping when they feel down—when we're feeling sad, we may be making really unwise decisions financially."

In other words, for the love of your wallet (and, for some, your ears), shut off "Christmas Shoes" should you hear those opening piano notes as you pull into the Wal-Mart parking lot to do your Christmas shopping.

Photo courtesy Daily Knowledge Tree.

Cryder CE, Lerner JS, Gross JJ, & Dahl RE (2008). Misery is not miserly: sad and self-focused individuals spend more. Psychological science, 19 (6), 525-30 PMID: 18578840

This post has been viewed: 714 time(s)

Tags:           

Share
Blog Comments

Cynthia McKelvey
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

I like the "retail therapy," tag. :)  So then, what would you say this means for the phrase, "money can't buy happiness"?


Jordan Gaines
Pennsylvania State University
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Perhaps it doesn't buy happiness, but instead just eliminates sad?!


Cynthia McKelvey
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Good enough for me!

sarah

Guest Comment

Wal-mart?

Add Comment?

For youtube videos, paste embed code directly in the text box

-

Members do not need to provide an address

-
Rate This Post
Total votes: 1
Select Comment Validation Method
Member
Name/URL (Guest)
FaceBook (Guest)
Member Commenting:


Authenticate with Facebook before submitting

OR


Make your LabSpaces comments count. Start earning LabSpaces points by becoming a member! Learn more.
Please verify that you are human: Register for LabSpaces
Make your LabSpaces comments count. Start earning LabSpaces points by becoming a member! Learn more.


Please authenticate before trying to post a comment.

If you would like to remain anonymous, please enter a new name and link below


Friends