banner
You are not using a standards compliant browser. Because of this you may notice minor glitches in the rendering of this page. Please upgrade to a compliant browser for optimal viewing:
Firefox
Internet Explorer 7
Safari (Mac and PC)
Post Archive
2018 (0)2011 (6)2010 (14)
Rate This Post
Total votes: 4
Blogger Profile

Kelly Oakes GBR

I'm an Undergraduate Physics student from Imperial College London, about to start the Masters year of my degree. I mostly write about physics research papers that I find interesting in the hope that other people will find them interesting too. The wordpress version of my blog is here.

My posts are presented as opinion and commentary and do not represent the views of LabSpaces Productions, LLC, my employer, or my educational institution.

Blog RSS Feed
RSS Add to My Yahoo Add to Google
Recent Comments

Before arriving in London, each student receives a short description of the room with the possibility to share a room with a number of other independent students. Twin rooms in flat shares are idea. . .Read More
May 25, 2013, 10:42am

The one thing you forgot to mention, the most important thing as far as I'm concerned, is the possibility that dark matter does not exist at all. It could be nothing but a by-product of our means o. . .Read More
Aug 11, 2012, 11:38am
Comment by kinetic energy in Physics is hard!

agreed, the amount of hours people put into their theories is crazy, but all worth it in the end. . . .Read More
Jun 04, 2012, 12:09pm

From Poincare and caos, for modest changes in the initial conditions, the motion of the system becomes chaotic and completely unpredictable. This is impotrtant for viewing two galaxies mix. Three b. . .Read More
Aug 01, 2011, 4:08pm

Poincare find that trhee body don not have mathematical representation. The mix of two galaxies must be a big caso .Or not? . . .Read More
Jul 29, 2011, 11:14pm
Thursday, November 4, 2010

When we look up into the sky at night, we see stars (even in London I can usually spot a few!). But there haven’t always been stars and galaxies in the universe. In a period known as the dark ages – not to be confused with the other dark ages – there was no light at all. After the the ionised gas that filled the universe in its very early life cleared, there was a very long period of, well, nothing. The universe was transparent, but contained no stars or galaxies for just less than 400 million years. The process that allowed stars and galaxies to eventually form is known as reionisation, and new research published in Nature last month details a discovery that may open a new window on to this time.

 

Galaxy UDFy-38135539 shown in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field. Image: NASA

In the paper, Lehnert and colleagues reported detecting the most distant object physicists have ever seen: a galaxy, the light from which was emitted less than 600 million years after the Big Bang. It’s the first galaxy known to have lived fully within the epoch of reionisation.

The galaxy, which goes by the catchy name UDFy-38135539, has a redshift* of z = 8.6 – the highest ever observed – and it was from this that the team were able to calculate the galaxy’s age. UDFy-38135539 was first spotted by Hubble’s Wide Field Camera 3, but Lehnert and colleagues made ground based observations using an instrument called SINFONI on the Very Large Telescope in Chile to look at the galaxy in more detail.

The instrument helped by splitting up the light from the galaxy in a process known as spectroscopy, allowing the team to look for a feature called the Lyman-α line. Each photon making up the Lyman-α line would have been emitted when an electron in a hydrogen ion dropped down from a higher energy level to a lower one. The photons that Lehnert and colleagues observed were ultraviolet when they were emitted from the galaxy, but when they reached Earth had wavelengths in the infrared region, giving the high redshift mentioned above. This stretching of the wavelength occurs because of the length of time the photons took to travel here – they were created just 600 million years after the big bang. This may sound like a long time, but if you consider that the age of the Universe is 13.7 billion years, you’ll appreciate that 600 million years is actually very early on in the grand scheme of things, and certainly very, very long ago. Physicists know that reionisation started within 600 million years of the Big Bang, so Lehnert and colleagues came to the conclusion that galaxy UDFy-38135539 must have lived within the epoch of reionisation.

 

Diagram showing the universe from the Big Bang, to now. Image: Wikipedia

At the beginning, the Universe was very hot and dense, with conditions similar to that in a particle accelerator. After three minutes, the Universe had expanded and cooled enough to have formed all of the elementary particles, as well as protons and neutrons (also in these first three minutes was the matter-antimatter annihilation that destroyed most of the antimatter in the universe). For 400,000 years after this the universe was full of ionised gas, and was opaque. Then, in a period known as recombination, the electrons and protons in the gas got together and formed atoms; this made everything a lot clearer. For around 400 million years after that, the universe remained transparent and rather empty, with no stars or galaxies. It was only when astronomical objects, possibly quasars or small galaxies, began to form due to gravitational collapse that things began to get a bit more interesting.

These objects poured radiation out into the universe, causing reionisation. During reionisation, electrons were stripped back off the hydrogen atoms that were formed when they first joined up with the protons, and the universe began to turn into an ionised gas once again. Fortunately, due to the expansion that had taken place in the time between recombination and reionisation, the universe was able to remain transparent despite these bubbles of plasma) that had begun to form all over the place. This process led to the formation of the stars and galaxies we see today, but physicists are not yet sure exactly how this all happened.

Because the galaxy UDFy-38135539 lived within the epoch of reionisation, it may be able to help us explain how reionisation started, and how these objects that formed in the cosmological dark ages were able to transform the universe from a mostly neutral one, to one filled with ionised gas.

There are already a few other faraway candidates lined up for study too, and Lehnert and colleagues have shown that such study is possible with current instruments, but astronomers will have to wait for the new wave of telescopes to really study reionisation in detail. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), which is the successor to Hubble, and the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT), which is the successor of the VLT, are two that will allow for this more detailed investigation. Both are due to be up and running later on this decade.

* Cosmological redshift is a measure of how fast an object is moving away from the Earth and is a consequence of the expanding Universe. Objects with higher redshift are moving away from the Earth faster than those with lower redshifts, and are further away too. See an earlier post of mine for an image showing redshift in action.

Reference

M. D. Lehnert, N. P. H. Nesvadba, J. -G. Cuby, A. M. Swinbank, S. Morris, B. Clement, C. J. Evans, M. N. Bremer, & S. Basa (2010). Spectroscopic confirmation of a galaxy at redshift z=8.6 Nature, 467 arXiv: 1010.4312v1

Further reading

BBC article, including short phone interview with Malcolm Bremer who was one of the physicists on the team.

Blog post at Cosmic log, which includes a Q&A with lead researcher Matt Lehnert

This post has been viewed: 455 time(s)

Blog Comments

Brian Krueger, PhD
Columbia University Medical Center
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

This is good stuff.  I think a lot of the time it's hard to understand how big the universe is until you look at research like this.  We can only see the data from this galaxy that was given off when it was 600 million years old and the universe is 25x older than that!  That data has come a LONG way.


Evie
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Awesome post Kelly. I love this stuff! Man, can you imagine if life developed in that galaxy, how old it would be.. and how much potential info they have.. Plus, if they do still exist it would mean that they didnt blow themselves up and have evolved beyond that behavior, which means they are potentially friendly.. Yea, ok, I am oddly optimistic today.


Kelly Oakes
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Thanks guys

I find it difficult to understand just how big / old the universe is too... writing stuff like this helps me get it straight in my head and puts things in a bit of context for me.

It's interesting to think about the possibility of life there, Evie, but then we're talking billions of years ago... if life managed to develop there, the star that was its "sun" must have surely finished the main sequence part of its life by now, which would be bad news for any life relying on it... meaning that they would have had to find some way to get out of their planetary system and find somewhere else to call home, or else adapt - which i'm not even sure is possible. i think i'm thinking about this a bit too much now...

 


Brian Krueger, PhD
Columbia University Medical Center
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Can you imagine setting out on a trip for a planet you thought was habitable only to get there and find out that it's gone from an "Earth" to a "Mars" while you were traveling :P


Evie
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Or worse! To find out the scientists that sent you knew that was the case all along..

 

Sorry guys, between my recent SG1/SGU marathon and this NaNoWriMo thing, my sci fi brain is on max :)


Brian Krueger, PhD
Columbia University Medical Center
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike
That'd make for a pretty sweet scifi script
Yoron

Guest Comment

You're doing a pretty good job with your blog Kelly.

Keep it up.

 

Yoron

Add Comment?
Comments are closed 2 weeks after initial post.
Friends