banner
You are not using a standards compliant browser. Because of this you may notice minor glitches in the rendering of this page. Please upgrade to a compliant browser for optimal viewing:
Firefox
Internet Explorer 7
Safari (Mac and PC)
twitter logo
Quick Link
The Writers
Recent Comments
Comment by Jordan Gaines in My MRI experience
May 25, 2012, 2:02pm
Comment by yannisguerra in My MRI experience
May 24, 2012, 6:16pm
May 23, 2012, 12:14pm
Comment by Mohammadbagher in Science: why I do it AND write it
May 20, 2012, 3:36am
Comment by RJ in Should I get a PhD?
May 10, 2012, 11:04pm
Comment by yannisguerra in EMR - Electronic Medical Records
May 10, 2012, 6:56pm
May 06, 2012, 4:53am
Apr 27, 2012, 7:07pm
Comment by Jordan Gaines in Science: why I do it AND write it
Apr 26, 2012, 12:15pm
Comment by Mickey Schafer in Science: why I do it AND write it
Apr 25, 2012, 8:22am
Comment by klassi in How Like You are You?
Apr 24, 2012, 1:41am
Comment by onecybertwechi in How Like You are You?
Apr 24, 2012, 1:40am
Comment by Michael Rawlins in Clothes make the man—literally
Apr 18, 2012, 10:04pm
Comment by Cynthia McKelvey in Salty Penguins Filter Salt Out Their Nose
Apr 09, 2012, 12:46pm
Author: Brian Krueger, PhD | Views: 279 | Comments: 14
Last by Thomas Joseph on Nov 23, 2010, 12:01pm






I'm back! And here's an early treat from my photographer and good friend, Todd Adamson

. . . More
Author: Brian Krueger, PhD | Views: 6375 | Comments: 136
Last by Isabel on Nov 26, 2010, 3:02pm
With the launch of this year’s “Rock Stars of Science” campaign, there’s been a lot of talk about how to best promote science. I’m no marketing guru, but I am a scientist. This latest campaign is better than last years', only because it’s more diverse, but I think it really misses the boat. Is the public really going to be inspired by a couple of pictures in GQ of scientists looking uncomfortable and over dressed in the presence of Rock Stars? The most appalling aspect of this campaign is that there is no highlight of the researchers or their science. There truly are some science all stars in this group, many of which are well spoken.

However, the Rock Stars of science pages in GQ only list the scientist’s name and title, while the “Rock stars” get a one or two sentence summary of how awesome they are for standing in on these pictures. What’s the real focus of this campaign? To promote Bret Michaels’ latest reality TV dreck? If a reader wants to actually understand why these scientists were chosen and what they’re doing to cure disease, they have to visit the website. I find it hard to believ . . . More
Friends