banner
You are not using a standards compliant browser. Because of this you may notice minor glitches in the rendering of this page. Please upgrade to a compliant browser for optimal viewing:
Firefox
Internet Explorer 7
Safari (Mac and PC)
Add a New Post
New Post Form
Please enter your login information Not a member? Check if you would like to be notified when someone replies to this thread.

Post History
Posted by: Evie
Posted on: Thu, Mar 10, 2011, 4:28 pm CST

My bad.. totally dropped the ball on that one.. I'm still in the midst of turmoil.. I'll do more when it calms down.

Posted by: Brian Krueger, PhD
Posted on: Thu, Mar 10, 2011, 3:25 pm CST

Yep, most of the bloggers on other networks only follow the blogs account

Posted by: Suzy
Posted on: Thu, Mar 10, 2011, 1:41 pm CST

I agree with TJ. I think the same people follow both so we probably don't necessarily need two.

But if we keep both, I think it would be good to have them going out at different times than each other.

Is there anyone following LSblogs that does not follow LabSpaces?

Posted by: Brian Krueger, PhD
Posted on: Thu, Mar 10, 2011, 1:24 pm CST

Someone else did run the LSblogs account.  I'd be glad to hand over the reigns, but whoever takes it over needs to be sure to tweet each post at least twice a day.  I save the 10am and 4pm hours for blog posts.  LSblogs also only gets blog content.  The main feed gets both :)

Posted by: Thomas Joseph
Posted on: Thu, Mar 10, 2011, 4:28 pm CST

Do we need both @LabSpaces and @LSBlogs? I know that Brian used to run one, and one of our ex-bloggers ran the other, and both gave different material. However they're both running the same tweets now. Should we diversify or consolidate our message? I wouldn't necessarily want to give all of us access to LSBlogs, but perhaps our blog entry summaries can be fed into LSBlogs tweet list? Trim the summary down to 100 characters and use the last 40 for a link and our twitter name?


Brian, fancy another project? ;)

Friends