You are not using a standards compliant browser. Because of this you may notice minor glitches in the rendering of this page. Please upgrade to a compliant browser for optimal viewing:
Internet Explorer 7
Safari (Mac and PC)
Post Archive
2019 (0)2011 (1)
January (1)

Et tu Odysseyus?
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
2010 (37)
December (5)

First most influential paper
Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Twelve (minus one) Months of pondering Blather
Tuesday, December 7, 2010

I'll save Tideliar the trouble
Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Thinking differently
Friday, December 3, 2010

Music Warz! - The Maccabees
Thursday, December 2, 2010
November (6)

Standing out in a crowd: An addendum
Monday, November 8, 2010

Standing out in a crowd
Friday, November 5, 2010

Ripping your arms off
Tuesday, November 2, 2010

The Tea Party explained
Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Words of wisdom for prospective graduate students
Monday, November 1, 2010

Grant advice
Monday, November 1, 2010
October (10)

Planet of the Apes
Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Too many postdocs?
Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Oh! Rats! [UPDATED]
Thursday, October 21, 2010

Rethinking Education
Monday, October 18, 2010

Elephant man, rabies and leprosy
Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Over-priced mochas and syphilis
Sunday, October 10, 2010

DonorsChoose - give early and give often. [UPDATED]
Friday, October 8, 2010

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

What I would be doing if I weren't doing science
Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Time spent reviewing
Monday, October 4, 2010
September (6)

Dear PI's who wrote the NSF proposals I am now reviewing...
Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Funding Illusions
Tuesday, September 28, 2010

FIve years ago today
Wednesday, September 22, 2010

A (temporary) cure for vortices of suckitude
Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Things that make Odyssey grumpy
Tuesday, September 14, 2010

What I wish I knew before starting my faculty position
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
August (10)

Flying 101
Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Don't panic!
Monday, August 23, 2010

One to Rule Them All
Friday, August 20, 2010

The NSF review panel process
Thursday, August 19, 2010

Peer review, schmeer review
Friday, August 13, 2010

Hypotheses: The most disposable of lab supplies
Thursday, August 12, 2010

How much do you need to want it?
Monday, August 9, 2010

Sunday, August 8, 2010

REPOST: How Many Papers for Tenure?
Thursday, August 5, 2010

Checking it out
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Rate This Post
Total votes: 2
Blogger Profile


I'm a molecular biophysicist in a biochemistry department. In a college of medicine. And I'm funded by the NSF. Not too sure my dean likes that... I'm here to blather on about things that interest me and to raise the average age of the bloggers here by at least 1.2567 years. And I'm Australian.

My posts are presented as opinion and commentary and do not represent the views of LabSpaces Productions, LLC, my employer, or my educational institution.

Blog RSS Feed
RSS Add to My Yahoo Add to Google
Recent Comments

Haha the comment above is funny! Research before hypothesis! . . .Read More
Aug 09, 2012, 1:48pm
Comment by Tim in Peer review, schmeer review

Good article! "Do proponents of this system have any idea just how hard it is to find reviewers under the current system?" I've just stumbled across this artcile, so my comments are. . .Read More
Oct 13, 2011, 5:20pm
Comment by Tideliar in Standing out in a crowd

Rules of the Internets, #3"Don't necro dead threads n00b"Corollary Rule 3.1"If the best you can add is content-lite, don't fucking necro dead threads n00b"Corollary Rul. . .Read More
Jul 06, 2011, 5:48pm

anyone interested in helping my kindergarteners? Check out http://www.donorschoos. . .Read More
Jan 25, 2011, 10:47am
Comment by Anonymous in Standing out in a crowd

Thanks for the post! Very helpful. - Reshmi . . .Read More
Jan 13, 2011, 12:44am
Awesome Stuff
Wikio RSS:


Site Meter

Locations of visitors to this page

Oct 15, 2014, 6:55am
Jan 26, 2014, 10:58am
Feb 29, 2012, 10:31am
Nov 19, 2011, 4:38pm
Feb 17, 2011, 9:40am
Feb 11, 2011, 8:27pm
Nov 07, 2010, 4:50pm
Friday, December 3, 2010

Thinking differentlyThe other day as I was walking to work, as is my want I was listening to a podcast. This particular one was from Science magazine. In this particular episode one part was about some recent work in quantum physics. In quantum physics there's this strange phenomenon called nonlocalilty. My very limited understanding of this is that you can have two separated objects that are somehow linked such that changing the quantum state of one instantaneously causes a change in the other. Einstein famously referred to this as "spooky action at a distance." Well, apparently some physicists have managed to come up with an explanation for this using Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. If you want to read about it, the article can be found here (you'll probably need a subscription...).

The point of this post however is not to make my head explode trying to understand such things, but rather is more to do with how these physicists supposedly came to link nonlocality with the uncertainty principle. In the podcast they were interviewing one of the authors of the Science paper who commented that they made this connection not by thinking like quantum physicists, but rather by trying to think like information scientists. This resonated with me. Not that I try to think like an information scientist (although I did once solve a research problem by thinking in terms of information rather than molecules). Rather, it resonated because my most creative periods as a scientist have come when I have either been surrounded by people from different disciplines who brought different ways of thinking about a problem, or I have tackled a research problem that is outside my area of expertise.

My first real experience of this was as a postdoc. At one point I was one of four postdocs in the lab. We had been trained in physical chemistry, organic chemistry, biochemistry and molecular biology respectively. At first glance you might think these are rather closely related disciplines. In some ways they are, but in my experience practitioners of each of these disciplines think somewhat differently. This was certainly the case here. These colleagues each approached the problems we were working on in different ways. I have come to believe it was my interactions with them and attempts to understand how they thought about problems that led to a particularly productive period in my tenure as a postdoc.

This has happened in other ways. While on tenure track through necessity I changed research directions, and more drastically approaches, to encompass areas I had zero training or background in. Again, this led to a spike in productivity. I was forced to think differently.

More recently I have, this time more through choice, changed research directions in a somewhat drastic manner. Once again productivity is on its way up. Not that I wasn't being productive before. Apparently thinking differently works for me.

This post has been viewed: 1243 time(s)

Blog Comments

UC Davis
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

I couldn't agree with you more, I generally thrive when there are other people to bounce ideas off of. It's amazing how differently people can see the same problem or task.

I'll have to check out that podcast it sounds really interesting.

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

I completely agree too. In fact, one of my fav things about work is that each member of the team approaches things differently, w totally different perspectives, and when you get them all in a room, you can really get the best of each and come up w a beautiful solution.

And like Jane, I too must listen to this podcast :)

Comrade PhysioProf

Guest Comment

I'm this way, too. In order to foster this, I am always on the lookout for post-docs to join my lab who have expertise in novel areas for us.


Guest Comment

This what I love and admire about a large chunk of the scientific challenge yourselves and others, accept critical thinking and analysis and actively embrace new ideas and concepts.

The rest of us could stand to learn a thing or two in that area alone.

I try to follow the same process in my work but the bruise on my head (from the brick walls!!) never seems to heal......

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

I also agree. one of the things I like best about my new place is that there are so many different perspectives. It really does expand how you think about your own science.


Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike


Yes. This is, I believe, the best way to build a productive lab.


Guest Comment
I was just talking about this the other day. That's where my sith training comes te most in handy. It's such a well rounded skill/ way of life that I can pretty much apply to all aspects of life. Or death, if talking about someone trying to cross me. It also helps me "think outside the box" and into other peoples brains. So no need to bounce ideas off when I can just take them for myself!!!!! Mwa haha

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

@Lordmagna - You make an excellent point. I shall keep that in mind.

Candid Engineer
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

My very favorite thing about my postdoc is the incredible diversity of talent that revolves through the door. Collaboration gives me more breadth than anything else. Glad it's still working for you.

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike


If it stopped working I suspect my research program would be in deep trouble...

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

That was a great lab, Dude. I think I learned more there than at any other time, although it didn't show in immediate productivity - it came later. The diversity in that lab and the experience as a whole laid a wonderful foundation for me.

And, related to that podccast, you must read The Age of Entanglement, When Quantum Physics was Reborn by Louisa Gilder. I picked it up last year around this time. It's a fascinating read into just the phenomenon you were listening to in the podcast. Really, really cool stuff.

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike


Hey dude! Long time no see/hear/type. Yes, that was something of a golden age for us both I think.

the modern scientist
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Couldn't agree more. Taking time to readjust those neurons has yielded a solution of many of my scientific problems. I've been mulling over a post related to this. Maybe you've just inspired me to write it!

Add Comment?
Comments are closed 2 weeks after initial post.