You are not using a standards compliant browser. Because of this you may notice minor glitches in the rendering of this page. Please upgrade to a compliant browser for optimal viewing:
Internet Explorer 7
Safari (Mac and PC)
Post Archive
2019 (0)2012 (1)2011 (51)
August (1)

Wednesday Micro Hits
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
July (1)

Is it worth getting an education?
Thursday, July 7, 2011
June (2)

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

It Gets Better
Thursday, June 2, 2011
May (4)

Wednesday Micro Hits
Wednesday, May 11, 2011

My first experience with science writing (Part 1 of 2)
Tuesday, May 10, 2011

This is why we get vaccinated
Thursday, May 5, 2011

Monday Morning Jam
Monday, May 2, 2011
April (2)

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, April 23, 2011

So long, farewell ...
Friday, April 1, 2011
March (10)

Stay Tuned ...
Thursday, March 31, 2011

From the Union of Concerned Scientists
Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Week 23 - Hockey Pool
Monday, March 14, 2011

March Madness
Monday, March 14, 2011

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, March 12, 2011

What a bargain!
Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Wednesday Micro Hits
Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Technique Overload
Monday, March 7, 2011

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, March 5, 2011

Et tu FDA?
Wednesday, March 2, 2011
February (10)

Saturday Morning Serenade - A Hip Edition
Saturday, February 26, 2011

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, February 19, 2011

Wednesday Micro Hits (on Thursday!)
Thursday, February 17, 2011

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Happy Valentine's Day
Monday, February 14, 2011

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, February 12, 2011

The GOP War on Science
Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Wednesday Micro Hits
Wednesday, February 9, 2011

People, how about some ...
Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, February 5, 2011
January (21)

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, January 29, 2011

Friday, January 28, 2011

Are you married to your reagents?
Thursday, January 27, 2011

Wednesday Micro Hits
Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Common Sense Tip #1
Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, January 22, 2011

From the Baby Boomers, a Big "Screw You"
Friday, January 21, 2011

Student Worker - More Student or More Worker?
Friday, January 21, 2011

Wednesday Micro Hits
Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, January 15, 2011

Holy moly!
Friday, January 14, 2011

Thursday Pondering
Thursday, January 13, 2011

The Electronic Office
Thursday, January 13, 2011

Wednesday Micro Hits
Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, January 8, 2011

The Plug - January Edition
Friday, January 7, 2011

Bits 'N Pieces
Thursday, January 6, 2011

Latest Manuscript Review
Wednesday, January 5, 2011

The $4 gallon of gas
Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Our slowly shrinking (and dying) planet
Tuesday, January 4, 2011

It's 2011 already? For reals?
Monday, January 3, 2011
2010 (46)
December (9)

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, December 11, 2010

The State of Microbiology
Thursday, December 9, 2010

Wednesday Micro Hits
Wednesday, December 8, 2010

2010 blogging meme
Tuesday, December 7, 2010

The Environmental Impact of the Christmas Season
Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Music Snobbery
Thursday, December 2, 2010

Phantom Power
Thursday, December 2, 2010

What's Your Name?
Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Wednesday Micro Hits
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
November (8)

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, November 27, 2010

Awakening from the food coma ...
Friday, November 26, 2010

Wednesday Micro Hits
Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Donor's Choose Final Followup (Recipes #3 and #4)
Tuesday, November 23, 2010

A Monday Mess
Monday, November 22, 2010

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, November 6, 2010

Wednesday Micro Hits (Peer-Review Edition)
Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Day 2 of the ASA-CSSA-SSSA Meeting (#ACSMtg)
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
October (29)

ASA-CSSA-SSSA Meeting - Day 1
Sunday, October 31, 2010

Stayin' Alive
Sunday, October 31, 2010

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, October 30, 2010

Wednesday Micro Hits (Vol. 4)
Wednesday, October 27, 2010

ASA-CSSA-SSSA Early Career Program
Monday, October 25, 2010

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, October 23, 2010

Wednesday Micro Hits (Vol. 3)
Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Donor's Choose - Family Recipe Number 1
Sunday, October 17, 2010

Making Good on Donor's Choose Bribe - Comfort Food Recipe 1
Saturday, October 16, 2010

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, October 16, 2010

Friday Wrap-Up and Random Thoughts (Vol. 2)
Friday, October 15, 2010

First I Begged, Now I Bribe
Thursday, October 14, 2010

Finding Out Things The Hard Way(TM)
Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Wednesday Micro Hits (Vol 2)
Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Here's where I start begging ...
Tuesday, October 12, 2010

#UnK3rn3d: Life Outside the Lab?
Tuesday, October 12, 2010

First fleas, now frogs?
Tuesday, October 12, 2010

No Fleas Please
Monday, October 11, 2010

My next Research Blogging article has been chosen ...
Sunday, October 10, 2010

Saturday Morning Serenade
Saturday, October 9, 2010

Donor's Choose
Friday, October 8, 2010

Friday Wrap-up and Random Thoughts
Friday, October 8, 2010

RB: Waste Not, Want Not.
Thursday, October 7, 2010

Research Blogging
Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Wednesday Micro Hits
Wednesday, October 6, 2010

What if I were not a microbiologist ...
Tuesday, October 5, 2010

TJ's Tips on Manuscript Review
Monday, October 4, 2010

Chinese plagiarism and the death of English-language journals
Friday, October 1, 2010

Allow Me a Formal Introduction
Friday, October 1, 2010
Rate This Post
Total votes: 4
Blogger Profile

Thomas Joseph

It's a Micro World after all is a blog dedicated to discussing pretty much whatever I feel like. When I delve into scientific matters it will primarily be discussing microbiology (agricultural, bioenergy, and environmental focus). Otherwise, I'll probably ramble on about sports and life.

My posts are presented as opinion and commentary and do not represent the views of LabSpaces Productions, LLC, my employer, or my educational institution.

Blog RSS Feed
RSS Add to My Yahoo Add to Google
Recent Comments

I really like these types of posts which are written in simple writing so that everyone can understand it, and everyone can understand what message does author wants to convey. The style of your is. . .Read More
May 16, 2018, 1:57am
Comment by canon support in RB: I'll Take My Mars Cold and Wet. You?

Optimum Geek Support is one of the best IT Support Company in Virginia USA. We also provide brother printer support, canon printer support, and Lexmark Printer Support, HP Printer Support, Norton, . . .Read More
Apr 30, 2018, 4:29am

Read More
Mar 09, 2018, 2:51am
Comment by live chat operators in RB: I'll Take My Mars Cold and Wet. You?

You must have the best live chat operators if you have them then you can generate more sales lead and do the better customer serviceRead More
Mar 09, 2018, 1:44am

nice post friend , Thank you for sharing with us, and we sincerely hope you will continue to update or post other articlesRead More
Mar 09, 2018, 12:47am
Awesome Stuff
Friday, January 21, 2011

This article got my blood boiling.

Americans overwhelmingly say that in general they prefer cutting government spending to paying higher taxes.

A comforting thought, and a bit of a no-brainer. Problem is, as we will see, that these Americans, who more than likely belong to the Baby Boomer generation, haven't given much thought beyond this sentiment. So, when they're pressed with specifics, they back off.

Yet their preference for spending cuts, even in programs that benefit them, dissolves when they are presented with specific options related to Medicare and Social Security ...

This paragraph, if I read it correctly, is poorly written. What happens is that when specific cuts are proposed, to programs that will benefit them, people back off from the desire of wanting cuts. Who is them? Baby Boomers would be the logical guess. Medicare and Social Security are two programs that Baby Boomers have banked on ... yet they're also the ones who have elected politicians who have routinely expanded those programs which have dwindled their reserves. Of course, the Baby Boomers want to pass the buck and keep those programs intact.

Nearly two-thirds of Americans choose higher payroll taxes for Medicare and Social Security over reduced benefits in either program.

Yeah, no kidding. Higher payroll taxes because they're all reaching retirement age and won't have to pay those taxes, yet reap the full benefit of those programs. Farcical, just like these suggestions ...

But given a choice of often-discussed revenue options, they preferred a national sales tax or a limit in the deduction for mortgage interest to a higher gasoline tax or taxing employer-provided health benefits.

Baby Boomers more than likely have their mortgages paid off, so the loss of mortgage deductions won't bother them. And worrying about taxes to health benefits? Won't impact the Baby Boomers one iota who will be moving to Medicare. The remaining taxes proposed here also will impact the younger generations more than they will the Baby Boomers. With jobs, the younger generation will use more gas and will have more "disposable income" so those two taxes will impact them more.

Americans’ sometimes contradictory impulses on spending and taxes ...

Like I said, if I read this article correctly, there is no contradictory impluse when considering the age of people who were most likely polled. If it's the Baby Boomer generation it is entirely consistent with a selfish generation. They don't want to increase taxes, because who would want to pay higher taxes. However, when faced with the proposition that by not increasing taxes they'll lose programs that will benefit them, they change their mind and support taxes in areas which will not impact them (or the impact will be significantly less).

Personally, I'd like to see a severe reworking of Social Security, Medicare, and the Military. We also need a systematic look into Medicare and Medicaid fraud, and a pulling back of military committments. Washington DC needs to get free of the grip of lobbyists and really do whats necessary for the country*. I think that by doing these things, we'd be able to not only get back on track financially, but it'd free up some money for national innovation to support and increase education and technology.


*A token billion dollar cut, when the deficit is fourteen TRILLION does no one any good.


ETA: Additional Reading

The Pinch

Baby Boomers Are A Big Burden

Medicare Fraud

This post has been viewed: 1780 time(s)


Blog Comments

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

First- where we might agree: I am, compared to most people, a big fan of raising taxes. On people like me. Also, people like wealthy or even just comfortable upper middle class babyboomers. Pretty much everybody, actually. When I played with that deficit reduction thingy a while back, I got it done with about 50% spending cuts and about 50% tax increases. So I've got that in the back of my mind as the 'ideal'.


Second- where I think you are off your gourd: Ok, you wanna explain how the poll got mostly babyboomers?

So, landlines are gonna bias it toward non-cellphone relying people... that'll do it somewhat.

But it says very clearly "The combined results have been weighted to adjust for variations in the sample relating to geographic region, sex, race, Hispanic origin, marital status, age, education and number of adults in the household."

Seriously. This is like ranting about a paper but not reading the materials and methods. They tell you how the did the poll.


Third, here's what *I* think is the best part of that poll: "if you had to pick one, which would you choose to cut (out of 'education' 'roads bridges and other infrastructure' 'science and medical research' 'aid to the unemployed and poor' 'no opinion')"

Repubs that say 'science and medical research': 26%

Dems that say 'science and medical research': 23%

Wait. What? You mean despite being the party of Palin-of-the-what's-a-fruitfly-good-for, repubs are NOT hugely more likely to want to cut science and medical research?

What do you want to bet that little fact will be completely glossed over by all the liberal scientist blog echo chamber?

*sigh*. Is 23 better than 26 (in context)? yep. is a 3 trillion dollar debt better than a 3.7 trillion dollar one (from the bush tax cut extension plans favored by the dems vs. the republicans)? yes. But we are not talking HUGE differences. We need an *actual* liberal party.



Thomas Joseph
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Becca, look at the last page. Almost half (48%) were people 45 and up. That's Baby Boomers or people well into retirement and already benefitting from Social Security and Medicare. The other two groups make up the remaining half and are roughly split between young adults either in college or starting careers, and those who are mid-career. How that means I'm off my gourd, I haven't the slightest. Did I overreached by placing all the blame on Baby Boomers when instead I should have said "old geezers" in general? Either way, the point is the same ... the younger generation is being asked to foot the bill for the mistakes of the past generations.

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

They *weighted it by age*. What does that mean? That if they polled babyboomers *out of proportion with their representation in the US* they simply paid less attention to what any one individual said. This is not a hard mathematical concept.

Of course, neither is 'majority' (i.e. >50%). And "baby boomer" isn't such a tricky concept either, although a little squishy (i.e. up to about age 65, not the ones over. You are ranting about 'baby boomers and older geezers' or 'baby boomers and already retired people'- you rant about baby boomers).

Of course, it's possible that 48% of the population is over the age of 45, and weighting things didn't affect the results much.

In which case, I have to ask, what if you ask any given 48% of the US how we should pay taxes and they mostly give answers that emphasize the other 52%? You could pick it on age, or gender, or race or anything. I see no reason it's not just
"'from the *taxpayers* a big 'screw you'"

Thomas Joseph
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

What does it mean? It means that if Baby Boomers do make up a majority of those polled (and it does look like it since it accounts for the entirety of the 45-64 age group which is the largest polled group in the poll, and a portion of the ambiguous 65+ group ... up to age 68), their answers counted less. Since the answers already trended in the direction of "keep programs that benefit the aged, increase taxes on the youngest Americans", if that's how a majority of the Baby Boomers answered, the results would be even more strongly in favor of what I ranted against if they were unweighted.

Personally, I'd love to see the raw numbers partly because I'm convinced it would support my position that the younger generations are going to get stuck with the bill. There is no way that the generations that preceeded Generation X (my generation) are going to allow us to make the reforms that are necessary. In part because they're the generation in power and have been for awhile (how many Gen X'ers are in positions of politican power?), inpart because we let them get away with it by not voting as a coherent bloc. We're screwed, plain and simple.

That's why this was labeled a rant, and is on a blog, and is not scientific discourse.

Thomas Joseph
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

FTR, I was using 1943 as the starting year for the Baby Boomer generation. Others (such as the AARP) have it starting in 1946.


Guest Comment
Boomers are the reason the US is in such dire straits for exactly the reasons stated. Selfish, selfish, selfish. Period.Think about who was hitting voting age when Ronnie was elected pres and ushered in the modern era of running up debt and transferring wealth into the pockets of the obscenely wealthy. Hello, top marginal tax rate!!!!!

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

You can blame the baby boomers only so much, the rest of the world the same problem of an aging and decreasing population. Yet the US has this amazing cult of personality in government, and an amazing level of pandering to the hoi polloi, and an amazingly low turn out rate for voting. It really is a perfect storm for well organized lobby groups to push the balance of power in any given election...

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

It's very nice to rant. But most political rants usually degrade into overgeneralizations and finger pointing.

Politics is the mindkiller, even for scientists

Genomic Repairman
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

I showed my dad, a baby boomer, this and he so eloquently said, "Yeah we fucked it up for everyone.  And sadly most of us don't care to fix it and those that do won't live long enough to be able to change the situation."

Thomas Joseph
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Yeah, the whole thing is a mess. I know the conservatives are talking tough when it comes to their "adult moment" and that they'll push through fixed to the three of the programs I mentioned above. However, I doubt they'll touch the military (we'll still be on the hook for two wars, and who knows where else the hawks will get us involved with in the next few years), and I bet they'll back off from Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security once they've been lobbied and threatened with loss of votes. Which means the cuts will come from the smallest portion of our budget (i.e., the ares that cuts "can" be made but won't amount to anything substantial). That smallest portion of our budget also happens to support education, energy, infrastructure, research, transportation ... all vital parts of society that are already being neglected. So they we get to pay more, get less, and watch our nation further sink under the burden of an expanding deficit. Yippie!

Ana Montana
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Another great posting! Kiss

Thomas Joseph
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Thanks Ana! Loved your post of a couple days ago too!

Add Comment?
Comments are closed 2 weeks after initial post.