You are not using a standards compliant browser. Because of this you may notice minor glitches in the rendering of this page. Please upgrade to a compliant browser for optimal viewing:
Internet Explorer 7
Safari (Mac and PC)
Post Archive
2019 (0)2012 (3)2011 (73)
December (1)

Robot Insects
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
November (6)October (5)

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Women's Intuition
Friday, October 21, 2011

Thinking with your Fingers
Monday, October 17, 2011

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

On Souls and Confections...?
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
September (7)

On Souls...?
Thursday, September 29, 2011

Beware the False Consensus Effect!
Saturday, September 24, 2011

Your Preferences - Preliminary Results
Thursday, September 22, 2011

Popularity Survey - DO IT FOR SCIENCE!
Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Zietsch's Response to PZ, Laden and Scicurious.
Tuesday, September 13, 2011

The Personality of Cities
Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Discussion #1 - Walking Speed and City Size
Sunday, September 4, 2011
August (6)

People who Doodle Learn Faster = Bullshit
Thursday, August 25, 2011

Good News Everyone!
Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Got the Time? Part II
Saturday, August 20, 2011

Got the time?
Sunday, August 14, 2011

Can Randomness Predict the Future?
Tuesday, August 9, 2011

The House of Psycasm
Sunday, August 7, 2011
July (7)June (6)May (8)

Part 1: Do We Have Freewill?
Tuesday, May 31, 2011

The Open Letter: A follow-up
Tuesday, May 31, 2011

This is a lie, she said.
Sunday, May 22, 2011

MSPaint is mightier than the Sword
Saturday, May 21, 2011

The Art of Indecision
Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Skeptical Checklist 1.1
Friday, May 13, 2011

The Skeptical Checklist 1.0
Sunday, May 8, 2011

Of Chimps, Children and Post-Grads...
Monday, May 2, 2011
April (5)March (5)February (7)January (10)

Magical Thinking: Voodoo, Prayer, Black Cats, and You
Thursday, January 27, 2011

The Art of Character Creation
Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Video Game Morality: Actions inside the box?
Friday, January 21, 2011

Psychobabble goes live!
Tuesday, January 18, 2011

The Trolley Problem: Who cares?
Sunday, January 16, 2011

Podcast delay and misc. Drugs!?
Saturday, January 15, 2011

My very own Natural Disaster
Wednesday, January 12, 2011

A window into your Genetics and Mate Preference?
Sunday, January 9, 2011

Oh sorry, I totally phased out there...
Thursday, January 6, 2011

Porn: A force of Mutual Benefits
Sunday, January 2, 2011
2010 (35)
December (7)

Statistical Pwnage
Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Why you should care...
Thursday, December 16, 2010

The paper of Influence
Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Sharing: Part I - Emotions
Sunday, December 12, 2010

No-one cuts deeper than a Science Blogger.
Thursday, December 9, 2010

Me Meme [Ohh, links now]
Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Half Full, or Half Empty? Well, That Depends on the Shape of the Glass.
Sunday, December 5, 2010
November (11)

What Your Voice Says About You
Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Babushka Blog: A Meta-Blog on ResearchBlogging.
Sunday, November 28, 2010

An Announcement:
Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Willful Self-Deception is Bliss
Sunday, November 21, 2010

Dance, Blogger, Dance!
Friday, November 19, 2010

The Science of Marriage
Sunday, November 14, 2010

The Moon and Antarctica
Thursday, November 11, 2010

Available: One Mentee. Good Condition.
Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Again we are limited by our puny human-ness
Sunday, November 7, 2010

Blogging Carnival - What is Psychopathology?: Origins
Friday, November 5, 2010

*sigh* Psi: A Rebuttal
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
October (12)

The Science of Mind-Reading
Thursday, October 28, 2010

How not to think yourself smart...
Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Welcome to Assassins' League
Sunday, October 24, 2010

TODO LATER. A story of procrastination and forgiveness.
Thursday, October 21, 2010

A man and his words.
Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Little kids, little minds...
Sunday, October 17, 2010

Smoking (maybemightcould) is Good.
Thursday, October 14, 2010

How to stop the Apocalpyse
Tuesday, October 12, 2010

How to trick yourself creative
Sunday, October 10, 2010

Siesta - It sounds like Fiesta, but isn't.
Thursday, October 7, 2010

The Dread Pirate Rift
Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Being Blonde. Natural or otherwise...
Sunday, October 3, 2010
September (5)
Rate This Post
Total votes: 2
Blogger Profile


Psycasm is the exploration of the world psychological. Every day phenomenon explained and manipulated to one's own advantage. Written by a slightly overambitious undergrad, Psycasm aims at exploring a whole range of social and cognitive processes in order to best understand how our minds, and those mechanisms that drive them, work.

My posts are presented as opinion and commentary and do not represent the views of LabSpaces Productions, LLC, my employer, or my educational institution.

Post Tags

Blog RSS Feed
RSS Add to My Yahoo Add to Google
Sunday, April 3, 2011

When was the last time you had good ol' belly laugh?

I know the last time I did was during the recording of the last Psychobabble, when Jess made a comment about watching Psycho then visiting your hypothetical mother-in-law who 'has always regarded you as a temporary fixture in her child's life'. For whatever reason this cracked me up. I ended up keeping a few seconds of my laugh in the recording (something I usually don't do), but edited out >60% of it. I made the decision to keep it because it sounded good. It was an honest-to-goodness belly laugh, and such a genuine display of emotion, I reasoned, could only be a good thing.

Then I got thinking. Why do we laugh - what purpose does it really serve?

But first - you need to laugh. Most of you have probably already seen it, but I guarantee you'll laugh again.

Who was laughing along? That baby cracks me up. I love it that he laughs so much he bangs his head (repeatedly) against the furniture. The father laughing along helps the situation. You can't help but know that everyone involved is just having an honest and genuinely happy time. But ... are they having fun, is it funny, is it an expression of joy, is it slapstick; and how is it different from the laughs we can have at a piece of wit, or an implicit in-joke, or the relief from some kind of near-miss?

I can't really be sure, and I'm not sure we can know all the subtleties, but it is clear that laughing is a social phenomenon.

First off I feel a little validated that I kept my laugh in the podcast (short though it was). Reysen (2006) ran a really simple little experiment that was modeled off a lot of the smiling literature. He obtained a bunch of laughing stimulus by videoing some willing participants (men and women; who were acting students) who read a passage while viewing funny pictures [perhaps like this one]...

He then asked the same group to read a passage and fake their laughter as similarly as possible as they could to their original laugh; and to read the passage without laughing (neutral).

Reysen (2006) then showed this stimuli to some undergrads. He found that people were rated as more likeable when they were laughing (genuine AND fake) compared to no laughing (neutral), but that there was no significant difference between likeability ratings between genuine and fake conditions. His data also revealed that people were slightly better than chance at detecting a fake laugh from a genuine laugh (the mean correct responses were 56.5%). There were a few things to note, though. Men often silently laugh, whereas women tend to laugh out loud. As a result he found the women who were laughing were rated as more likeable than men doing the same. In a second study he controlled for this by showing only pictures (not videos) under the same conditions. He basically replicated the findings:

a) Fake and Genuine Laughs were more likeable than neutral expressions;

b) Fake and Genuine Laughs didn't appear to differ from each other;

c) Women were still more likeable;

d) People could detect fake vs. genuine at 54.88% (significantly above chance)

The Women = Likeable is a little confusing, because I can think of no immediate reason why a woman laughing should be more likeable than a man doing the same (the raters were both men and women). Some interesting implications there, I should think.

But there are other reasons why we might laugh.

"In thinking about laughter's functional significance, one should bear in mind that laughter is decidedly a social signal, as it is far more likely to be produced in the presence of another individual than when alone... We conceptualize antiphonal* laughter as being part of an affect-induction process that promotes affiliative, cooperative behaviours between social partners "

Smoski & Bachorowski (2003)

*'Antiphonal' is a fancy biological terms that refers to co-occurring vocalizations in animals. It's used predominantly in the animal behaviour literature. The term 'Reciprocal' works just as well in the human context.

So here's what Smoski & Bachorowski (2003) did. Imagine yourself entering the lab with a friend (same sex, or different sex; depending on the condition) and being asked to come up with as many names for an inflatable copy of 'The Scream' by Munch.

... now imagine that you and your friend have to draw crayon portraits of each other.

... hilarious, right? Now imagine you had to do all that with a stranger (same or opposite sex).

...really, really awkward...

Here's what they found:

[Smoski & Bachorowski, 2003]

Not too surprising, really. Friends laugh more often than strangers. The real stand out (for me) is how much more Female strangers laugh together, compared to Male strangers, or mixed partners. I won't go into what Smoski & Bachorowski (2003) said, but I'll ask you to hypothesize why you think men and women differ in the propensity to laugh with each other.

Now Smoski & Bachorowski (2003) coded anything that seemed like it would be a laugh in an every day context. So a certain kind of grunt or snigger, or a catch in the throat that seemed like laughter was coded as laughter. This seems fair to me, all said and done, we're all pretty experienced at determining a laugh when we see one.

Yet not all laughs have been created equal, according to Bachorowski and Owren (2001). Given the data and the name there I'm surprised that they didn't control for type-of-laugh in the last study; alternatively there's some piece of the literature that diminishes the following finding. However, it seems relevant with my limited understanding.

The following are results obtained by getting male and female listeners to rate how much they would like to meet the laugher, how friendly they sound, and how sexy they sound.

[The two bars on the left are 'voiced' and the two bars on the right are 'unvoiced'. That is left is out loud laugh-as-a-sing-song noise, and 'unvoiced' as a grunt, snigger, chuckle, etc.]

They found voice laughs generally elected more positive emotion, and female voiced laughs were more friendly and sexier than male voiced laughs. On the flip side, an unvoiced female laugh was usually considered less positive than a male voiced or unvoiced laugh, or a female voiced laugh.

[Note: The 'Laugh Track' question is how likely one would be to endorse the laugh for a laugh track].

So I think the moral of the story is to laugh if you want people to like you. Kind of lends a bit of a support to the joke about always laughing at your bosses jokes, but turns it on its head. We don't laugh to protect out Boss, we laugh 'cause we want our Boss to like us. There is a figure in my life who tells the most banal jokes, but who always cracks the room up. I always intuited that we did it because we were being polite, but it seems the motivation may be a little bit more self-serving. Sure, there's a lot of other things going on in that context but it seems like a plausible extension of a more personal relationship.

Finally, here's a quick video that raises some interesting questions. Why is she laughing? What's going on? Are other people laughing (in her head) too? What kind of laugh is that? A laugh at wit? A laugh between friends? A laugh at another?


<    ) &




       (  ) $


Reysen, S. (2006). A New Predictor of Likeability: Laughter North American Journal of Psychology

Smoski, M., & Bachorowski, J. (2003). Antiphonal laughter between friends and strangers Cognition & Emotion, 17 (2), 327-340 DOI: 10.1080/02699930302296

Bachorowski, J., & Owren, M. (2001). Not All Laughs are Alike: Voiced but Not Unvoiced Laughter Readily Elicits Positive Affect Psychological Science, 12 (3), 252-257 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00346

This post has been viewed: 1533 time(s)

Blog Comments

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Cool post! I quite enjoyed it.

Brian Krueger, PhD
Columbia University Medical Center
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

I liked it too. I posted a link to an ABC news story about sleep deprivation making you more apt to laughter.

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Ha! Haven't we all been there?

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

That last girl is actually ROFLing...

Add Comment?
Comments are closed 2 weeks after initial post.