![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Brian Krueger is the owner, creator and coder of LabSpaces by night and Next Generation Sequencer by day. In his blog you will find articles about technology, molecular biology, and editorial comments on the current state of science on the internet.
My posts are presented as opinion and commentary and do not represent the views of LabSpaces Productions, LLC, my employer, or my educational institution.
Please wait while my tweets load 
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Finish out the school year for a needy classroom with a DonorsChoose matched donation
AARP put out a commercial a few months ago deriding wasteful spending in Washington. Unfortunately, the soundbytes don't accurately represent the full story behind the spending. Have a watch before continuing.
The main points of this mis-infomercial are: We're wasting money on a Brazillian corn institute, Poetry in Zoos, Shrimp on treadmills, and pickle technology. The problem is that the commercial, due to its brevity, is misinformed and tries to induce a rage reaction that for the most part is unwarranted.
When considering the facts, AARP's commercial is really infuriating. However, the soundbytes taken at face value shouldn't make you angry, but the way that the commercial tries to dupe the viewer should. Essentially, the corn institute is a bribe that saves us billions in trade sanctions, while shrimp on treadmills and pickle technology are pieces of important grants that assess the health and safety of entire industries. Now, maybe poetry in zoos could be considered wasteful spending in these tough economic times, but using misleading soundbytes to disparage science is neither fair nor helpful. When we talk about failing economies, the last sector that should have its funding cut is science. The discoveries and innovations made in government funded labs around the country are the lifeblood of our economy. Without their work, we cannot expect to remain world leaders in research, especially with countries like China investing billions in biomedical research while Republican politicians are talking about cutting funding to some of our most valuable scientific assets.
This post has been viewed: 1595 time(s)
![]() |
![]() |
It's also infuriating because the real threat to Social Security and Medicare isn't some nickel-and-dime tradeoff between that and a few science grants, it's the insistence that "we're broke" and everything must be cut rather than let any tax cuts expire. With only a passing mention of "tax loopholes", this ad implicitly buys into that mindset, apparently in the belief that outrage, no matter how misdirected, is the most effective result.
Totally agree, and that's why it's so annoying that they targetted 2 science projects. The amount of money they're talking about is insignificant when compated to the budget or the debt. Why throw science under the bus? We make all of the drugs and therapies that keep old people alive :)
Hi Brian, I am certainly interested in both continuity and accuracy of PacBio sequencing. However, I no longer fear the 15% error rate like I first did, because we have more-or-less worked . . .Read More
Great stuff Jeremy! You bring up good points about gaps and bioinformatics. Despite the advances in technology, there is a lot of extra work that goes into assembling a de novo genome on the ba. . .Read More
Brian,I don't know why shatz doesn't appear to be concerned about the accuracy of Pacbio for plant applications. You would have to ask him. We operate in different spaces- shatz is concerned a. . .Read More
Hey Jeremy, thanks for the clarification! I really enjoyed your talk and seeing Moleculo in action. I just wish we knew more details about how it worked. One question though, why do you think. . .Read More
Hey Brian- good post, I don't like Moleculo because they do the work (i dont have problem reconstructing sub assemblies of millions of reads:) although many people do appreciate the ease of data colle. . .Read More