This press release was posted to serve as a topic for discussion. Please comment below. We try our best to only post press releases that are associated with peer reviewed scientific literature. Critical discussions of the research are appreciated. If you need help finding a link to the original article, please contact us on twitter or via e-mail.
On the other hand, I learned yesterday from a lecture that if you remove smell receptors in drosophilla, they live longer, just as occurs with actual calorie restriction. And some of those calorie-restriction studies are looking at in utero effect, so there's no reason to assume the smell factor wouldn't apply there as well.
Logically, preganant woman have two choices:
1) eat a wide variety of foods, cause your childs brain to develop well, doom him/her to short life
2) eat bland foods, stunt their brain, but allow them to live forever (and probably in better health than the above).
Let's hope the model systems are flawed for people. These choices suck.
I have 5 year old identical twins who have very different food preferences. One loves peas while the other prefers carrots. One loves mushrooms while the other refuses to even put them in her mouth. One loves chocolate and the other is not really interested. I had a lot of food aversions while I was pregnant an almost lived on frosted mini-wheats and ice cream with strawberries. Yet both girls have love a large variety of foods.
I know the sample size (n=1) is small, but based on my results, I really wonder if we can assume the mouse model works for humans.
I really wonder if we can assume the mouse model works for humans.
Mice are a great model for some things. Doing a twin study would have been beneficial here!
I haven't read the article, but I suspect they looked at litters of pups which is sort of like a twin study. I hope someone does some kind of human follow up story.
I am always a bit skeptical about studies with "model" organisms anyway. I study insect physiology and molecular biology and Drosophila are actually a pretty poor model for insect studies. They do things that in ways that are unlike a lot of other insect species.
Totally agree, Cricket. This quote by the researcher is pretty short sighted given what we know about other correlations found in mice: "Due to the similarities in mammalian development, she said, there is no reason to think that experiments would produce different results in humans." There are plenty of cases, especially with drug trials, where compounds work amazingly well in mice and don't do a damn thing in humans.
Free-living songbirds show increased stress hormone levels when nesting under white street lights. But different light spectra may have different physiological effects as this study finds, suggesting that using street lights with specific colour spectra may mitigate effects of light pollution on wildlife
Scientists identify the condition aphantasia, in which people cannot create images in their head
The dust in our homes contains an average of 9,000 different types of fungi and bacteria, a study suggests.
A mosquito can bear up to 23 times its total body weight on each leg, which is crucial for landing on water – the insect's secret is way it stands
Tropical species with smaller geographical ranges are more likely to die out in a warming climate than those that can adapt by ‘invading’ new regions
Most people think of bacteria as germs, signs of filth, or unwanted bringers of disease. Slowly, that view …
The gloomy octopuses crowded at Jervis Bay, Australia, appear to spit and throw debris such as shell at each other in what could be an intentional use of weapons
Therapies based on hormones that make us more trusting enhance our natural placebo effect – a finding that could alter the way clinical trials are conducted
The blind, hairless babies born recently at Washington D.C.'s National Zoo are completely dependent on their mothers—who can sometimes accidentally crush them.
The poop-hoarding insects have an amazingly advanced internal GPS that allows them to navigate by day or night.
0