You are not using a standards compliant browser. Because of this you may notice minor glitches in the rendering of this page. Please upgrade to a compliant browser for optimal viewing:
Internet Explorer 7
Safari (Mac and PC)
Post Archive
2017 (0)2011 (4)
February (2)

PSA: It's cold, buy a Carbon Monoxide Detector.
Thursday, February 10, 2011

Cold Fusion
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
January (2)

Going back
Thursday, January 27, 2011

Fun with Jackass
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
2010 (33)
December (4)

The 12 days of (Lab) Christmas
Friday, December 24, 2010

I really hope there isn't a number 3
Thursday, December 9, 2010

So why don't you have more papers?
Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Picking a project
Thursday, December 2, 2010
November (2)October (7)

As promised: Geeka and A Cow
Saturday, October 23, 2010

Finishing something
Saturday, October 23, 2010

A cartwheeling Geeka
Monday, October 18, 2010

Some Classroom got funded, I get embarrassed.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Bounty for Donor's Choose
Wednesday, October 6, 2010

If I couldn't be a scientist
Tuesday, October 5, 2010

That's not the shape of his head.
Friday, October 1, 2010
September (6)

Glutton for Punishment
Saturday, September 25, 2010

I talk to machines.
Friday, September 24, 2010

World's worst Journal Club.
Monday, September 20, 2010

The IACUC Chair
Thursday, September 16, 2010

Hell, I did know then, I just didn't know it until it hit me.
Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Stuff Geeka Likes: The Toys Edition
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
August (9)

How I ended up a scientist.
Saturday, August 28, 2010

Monday morning crapped on my head.
Monday, August 23, 2010

Naming your equipment
Thursday, August 19, 2010

Stuff Geeka Likes: Inaugural edition
Thursday, August 12, 2010

Silent Squee
Wednesday, August 11, 2010

In which I come clean
Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Having a bad day
Monday, August 9, 2010

My blogging philosophy
Friday, August 6, 2010

Balance? We don't need no stinking balance.
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
July (5)
Rate This Post
Total votes: 0
Blogger Profile


Hi! I'm Geeka. I've been a scientist for, I don't know, it seems like forever, I guess since I started college, so, like 15 years? Anyhow, this is where I'm going to give my take on a bunch of stuff. I'm usually a little bit out there (that is, I don't see the obvious at the outset), which means that you are probably going to have to deal with reading such topics as: Interpersonal relationship training for scientists, my lab pet peeves, how to get along in business when you just came straight out of academia, trying to deal with having a life and being a scientist, really odd topics for a paper, random stuff I found on the internet that made me shoot coffee out of my nose, you know, (ab)normal Geeka. Why the title? Because at the very heart of me, I'm a virologist, and while I don't necessarily do that now, it's how I view the scientific world.

My posts are presented as opinion and commentary and do not represent the views of LabSpaces Productions, LLC, my employer, or my educational institution.

Blog RSS Feed
RSS Add to My Yahoo Add to Google
Thursday, December 2, 2010

Some PI's are of the variety that the recruit based upon the specific project they have to get off the ground (i.e. just got funded). Some recruit because they have this idea that they need prelim data on. Some PIs are in the boat that you can do whatever (within reason) that you are interested in. There are pitfalls to all of these.

In the first case, you have a pretty good project that is funded, there's some prelim data on it, there is direction. Downfalls: your PI has a very specific place they want this to go, so while you may have all the footwork done, you if you don't get the exact information that they want, they could give you bullshit 'confirmatory' stuff to do. If your PI is standup, you could probably get out soon. But, you probably are going to have to do an additional post-doc to prove your worth and learn some more techniques.

In the second case, it's kind of what science should be, there's a question, an idea, and someone needs to do the work. This might take long because you might have to develop something/make something. This might be very rewarding though. If it get's funded, great, but you should be aware of the fundability of the project.

The third case (and I will admit that my own PhD experience was more 3 than 2), you learn a lot. You are going to be there a while (unless you have magic hands), but it's a project that you came up with, something that you have invested in. There are also going to be funding hurdles, and there are going to be PI hurdles. PI hurdles include them not remembering what you are doing and why, or not getting it at all.

Sure, these are broad strokes, but picking your project is a broad stroke. You pick it based upon where it's been and where it's anticipated to go. It's like a stock, past performance doesn't guarantee future returns.

This post has been viewed: 234 time(s)

Blog Comments

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

"It's like a stock, past performance doesn't guarantee future returns."

Awesome summation..

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

I think a lot of it depends if you are picking a project for grad school or a postdoc. When I was in GS, Type 1 projects were usually done by MD/PhD students working in ultrafamous megalabs, just pick an off-the-shelf project, get a GlamourPub, and be out of the lab in 3 years. Not very useful as a learning experience. Type 2 I think is ideal for graduate students who want to learn to think independently, yet still have a framework to function within. Grad students shouldn't worry about the fundability of the project, that's the PI's job. Type 3 are ideal for postdocs wishing to establish independence, and probably almost necessary to land a TT job, where you can prove you can function independently as a PI.

Brian Krueger, PhD
Columbia University Medical Center
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

My graduate experience started out as #1. That project bombed hardcore so we moved on to a project #2 type scheme where we had a cool set of "fishing expedition" data and no prelim biochemical data, and the last chapter of my thesis is all a project #3 set of experiments that I came up with completely on my own and developed a new technique to understand some interesting interaction biochemistry.  I don't think project choosing necessarily fits in a neat little box.  The best thing to do is have an interesting question and if things don't pan out, move on to another related interesting question after a few months.  Part of the learning experience is knowing when it's time to give up on a project.

Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Brian: I totally hear you on learning when to give up. The 1st 2 years of my PhD project got scrapped.

Namnezia: I agree that it shouldn't be the students job to worry about funding, but it still happens. If you don't think that the lab is going to be around in 2 years, you need to do what's in your best interest, which is either go to another lab, or try to find some sort of funding/get put on a training grant or something.

Add Comment?
Comments are closed 2 weeks after initial post.