Views: 302 |
Comments: 14 Last by Brian Krueger, PhD on Apr 10, 2011, 6:49am
I thought about this question probably everyday of my graduate school career. My days usually went like this:
1. Get to lab at 7am
2. Start 12hr experiment
3. 7pm, experiment failed
4. 7:15pm set it all up again for tomorrow
Eventually I got everything to work but that 12hr period in the middle was filled with:
"I bet me engineer friends don't have to deal with this shit, and they're getting paid 6 times as much as me."
"I should have just become a web designer. I have fun doing that AND things usually work the first time."
"I want to run away to the cirus and become a Barker."
My PhD mentor once told me that I was the weirdest person he'd ever met because I have too many hobbies. He didn't think I could be successful in lab if I ran a website, went to the gym for two hours in the middle of the day, maintained my saltwater fish tank etc. I think he saw all of these things as distractions, or more like, "If he spent that energy in lab, he'd have a billion papers by now." Well, Honestly I can only take so much science and I need all of these hobbies to keep me sane. Further, I think I could turn any of my hobbies into careers.
In middle school, my mom worked for a computer training c . . .
More
Brian, I think you have made the mistake of thinking Arsenic Life was ever alive. It was stillborn. There was no evidence provided in the Science paper of incorporation of arseni. . .Read More
Alex Merzsaid: A complete manuscript with full data and a reasonably complete description of the experime. . .Read More
There ARE many peer-reviewed papers already published that tell us that "arsenic life" is almost certainly nonsense. For example, it's been understood for decades that arsenodiester bonds are . . .Read More
That's a great point Zen. But are FTLN a good example that science reporting should aspire to? How many people stopped following the debate after the first story? How many of those people still. . .Read More
"Reporting on data that has not gone through the peer review process as if it were truth is not responsible journalism." I have also been shocked, SHOCKED, I say, to see a paper deposited i. . .Read More