banner
You are not using a standards compliant browser. Because of this you may notice minor glitches in the rendering of this page. Please upgrade to a compliant browser for optimal viewing:
Firefox
Internet Explorer 7
Safari (Mac and PC)
Post Archive
2018 (0)2012 (3)2011 (73)
December (1)

Robot Insects
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
November (6)October (5)

BRB
Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Women's Intuition
Friday, October 21, 2011

Thinking with your Fingers
Monday, October 17, 2011

Choice
Tuesday, October 11, 2011

On Souls and Confections...?
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
September (7)

On Souls...?
Thursday, September 29, 2011

Beware the False Consensus Effect!
Saturday, September 24, 2011

Your Preferences - Preliminary Results
Thursday, September 22, 2011

Popularity Survey - DO IT FOR SCIENCE!
Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Zietsch's Response to PZ, Laden and Scicurious.
Tuesday, September 13, 2011

The Personality of Cities
Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Discussion #1 - Walking Speed and City Size
Sunday, September 4, 2011
August (6)

People who Doodle Learn Faster = Bullshit
Thursday, August 25, 2011

Good News Everyone!
Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Got the Time? Part II
Saturday, August 20, 2011

Got the time?
Sunday, August 14, 2011

Can Randomness Predict the Future?
Tuesday, August 9, 2011

The House of Psycasm
Sunday, August 7, 2011
July (7)June (6)May (8)

Part 1: Do We Have Freewill?
Tuesday, May 31, 2011

The Open Letter: A follow-up
Tuesday, May 31, 2011

This is a lie, she said.
Sunday, May 22, 2011

MSPaint is mightier than the Sword
Saturday, May 21, 2011

The Art of Indecision
Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Skeptical Checklist 1.1
Friday, May 13, 2011

The Skeptical Checklist 1.0
Sunday, May 8, 2011

Of Chimps, Children and Post-Grads...
Monday, May 2, 2011
April (5)March (5)February (7)January (10)

Magical Thinking: Voodoo, Prayer, Black Cats, and You
Thursday, January 27, 2011

The Art of Character Creation
Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Video Game Morality: Actions inside the box?
Friday, January 21, 2011

Psychobabble goes live!
Tuesday, January 18, 2011

The Trolley Problem: Who cares?
Sunday, January 16, 2011

Podcast delay and misc. Drugs!?
Saturday, January 15, 2011

My very own Natural Disaster
Wednesday, January 12, 2011

A window into your Genetics and Mate Preference?
Sunday, January 9, 2011

Oh sorry, I totally phased out there...
Thursday, January 6, 2011

Porn: A force of Mutual Benefits
Sunday, January 2, 2011
2010 (35)
December (7)

Statistical Pwnage
Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Why you should care...
Thursday, December 16, 2010

The paper of Influence
Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Sharing: Part I - Emotions
Sunday, December 12, 2010

No-one cuts deeper than a Science Blogger.
Thursday, December 9, 2010

Me Meme [Ohh, links now]
Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Half Full, or Half Empty? Well, That Depends on the Shape of the Glass.
Sunday, December 5, 2010
November (11)

What Your Voice Says About You
Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Babushka Blog: A Meta-Blog on ResearchBlogging.
Sunday, November 28, 2010

An Announcement:
Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Willful Self-Deception is Bliss
Sunday, November 21, 2010

Dance, Blogger, Dance!
Friday, November 19, 2010

The Science of Marriage
Sunday, November 14, 2010

The Moon and Antarctica
Thursday, November 11, 2010

Available: One Mentee. Good Condition.
Tuesday, November 9, 2010

Again we are limited by our puny human-ness
Sunday, November 7, 2010

Blogging Carnival - What is Psychopathology?: Origins
Friday, November 5, 2010

*sigh* Psi: A Rebuttal
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
October (12)

The Science of Mind-Reading
Thursday, October 28, 2010

How not to think yourself smart...
Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Welcome to Assassins' League
Sunday, October 24, 2010

TODO LATER. A story of procrastination and forgiveness.
Thursday, October 21, 2010

A man and his words.
Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Little kids, little minds...
Sunday, October 17, 2010

Smoking (maybemightcould) is Good.
Thursday, October 14, 2010

How to stop the Apocalpyse
Tuesday, October 12, 2010

How to trick yourself creative
Sunday, October 10, 2010

Siesta - It sounds like Fiesta, but isn't.
Thursday, October 7, 2010

The Dread Pirate Rift
Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Being Blonde. Natural or otherwise...
Sunday, October 3, 2010
September (5)
Rate This Post
Total votes: 1
Blogger Profile

Psycasm

Psycasm is the exploration of the world psychological. Every day phenomenon explained and manipulated to one's own advantage. Written by a slightly overambitious undergrad, Psycasm aims at exploring a whole range of social and cognitive processes in order to best understand how our minds, and those mechanisms that drive them, work.

My posts are presented as opinion and commentary and do not represent the views of LabSpaces Productions, LLC, my employer, or my educational institution.

Post Tags

m
Blog RSS Feed
RSS Add to My Yahoo Add to Google
Tuesday, January 25, 2011

ResearchBlogging.org

I bought my girlfriend a Wii some time ago and before playing any game we spent 2 hours making Mii's of ourselves and all the people we know. A Mii - for those not in the a know - is your Wii avatar. It is associated with your personal stats on games such as WiiFit and WiiSport. Now Mii's are downright cartoony, but we tried to make them as lifelike as possible. After you're done it asks for your weight and height (for WiiFit) and calculates your BMI. Now I had made my Mii a fairly fit looking character, but given I carry a bit of muscle, my BMI came out as 'overweight' and it updated my Mii accordingly, and blew the little guy out. I felt outraged! That is not me, what I created was me! And it wouldn't change me back without a judgmental message (yeah, WiiFit totally judges you).

I also created a second Mii. It was my stoner alter-ego. I used him exclusively when I was playing on the Wii after drinking. I created a dummy account because I didn't want to skew my 'real' stats.

I've also created some kind of weird cat-class avatar (who might have also been female, I can't remember) when I played Morrowind: Elder Scrolls (a game which I probably invested 150+ hours in).

What does it mean? Why did I protect the real Mii against drunken Wii-Golf stats? Why do all nerds on youtube with character-class tutorials have hot female avatars? Is the warrior really better than the caster?*

Trepte and Reinecke (2010) suggest that a number of factors come into a play when players create an avatar. Those factors include competitiveness of the game, Identification with the Avatar, and Self-Satisfaction. Intuitively we could probably list off a few more - gender and sexual orientation spring to mind, and I'm sure there are more (beyond the confounding class-benefits of stats**). Trepte and Reinecke (2010) found that the less competitive a game was the more similar our avatar was to ourselves in terms of personality characteristics, and the more competitive a game was the less similar an avatar was. Additionally, those who were less satisfied with their own personality characteristics created a character that was more dissimilar to themselves than those who were satisfied. 'Identification' encompasses the 'connection' between player and avatar, and the intentions of the players regarding the goals of the game. On occasion I have literally spent an hour crafting my perfect character before setting out, only to go back, recraft, and begin again because my avatar didn't 'fit' me. I'm sure I'm not alone in this experience. They found that identification boosted enjoyment with the game, particularly for non-competitive games.

...yet it's worth skipping the Freudian crap. Trepte and Reinecke (2010) report that competent and satisfied people create competent and powerful avatars, and less competent and less satisfied people create competent and powerful avatars. The trick, perhaps, (which they acknowledge) is not so much what people are thinking and how they are representing themselves, but how they intend to play. It is exceedingly reasonable to suggest that players are simply optimizing their playing experience - who wants to handicap their playing experience? +3 to attack - Yes, Please. -2 to defence - No, Thank you. That's not to say a carefully controlled study can't reveal some really cool findings, but the quasi-experiment that Trepte and Reinecke (2010) conducted doesn't quite cut it.

I used to play Diablo II on Battle.net. You'd rock up to a game, trade a bit, head out and kill some demons, then rinse and repeat. For hours. It was great fun. But you also had the option of cutting someone down, stealing their gold and claiming their ear as a trophy (a risky strategy), retreating in battle, letting them fall, and claiming their gold and items (less risky, but a serious gaming faux pas), or helping unconditionally for mutual benefit (common and fun). All worked well, but the second one was definitely the best for quickly earning cash. Smith (2010) has a theoretical paper regarding trust in games and explains some existing models, games and examples. He contends that there are genuine cues as to a players trustworthiness in game - be they imposed by the game design, or organically emerged - that allow the game to be successful. He doesn't appear to address in-group / out-group dynamics, which might be a genuine mechanism in deciding trust. For instance, I might choose not to enter the battle field if there's a player that could overpower me in seconds, but rather choose someone like myself (similarly ranked) such that we both benefit from working together evenly, and any battle between us would be difficult and costly to the both of us.

So a lot of games come down to zero-sum equations and prisoner's dilemma type scenarios. The above is a classic example, but with the exception of the trophy ear, it wasn't the focus of the game. Here's one that builds in a whole new level Game Theory. The premise is that you and a crew of online buddies conduct a heist. At this point if you're successful in escaping you all split the cash evenly. But at any time you can top your buddy, add his share to the pool and keep going. I'm pretty sure there's some bonuses for co-operation, but the gains are quicker and easier if you play the traitor. The game, naturally, becomes a uniquely tense experience where you're not so sure if it's worth shooting your mate in the back before he does so to you.

 

In my mind, however, there's nothing ground-break nor experimental within [Smith, 2010] , so I won't go into any depth. I remember reading anecdotal reports of this game at the time, and it seems that Game Theory pays off, with the great majority co-operating all/most of the time, with only a small percentage of traitors.

...and of course, the only question left to ask, is it possible to behave morally in a game that is built around such a well research principle (game theory?).

 

 

*Obviously not. That's ridiculous.

* My cat class character benefited from some 1337 stealth skills....

---

Trepte, S., & Reinecke, L. (2010). Avatar Creation and Video Game Enjoyment Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 22 (4), 171-184 DOI: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000022

Smith, J. (2010). Trusting the Avatar Games and Culture, 5 (3), 298-313 DOI: 10.1177/1555412009359764

This post has been viewed: 4037 time(s)

Blog Comments

Thomas Joseph
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Re: alter-ego Mii's. I have "Evil Tom". I must admit, I like playing my alter-ego more than my "truer to life" Mii, even when it comes to playing non-competitive games. Does that mean I carry a more competitive spirit than the people I regularly game with? (This wouldn't surprise me by the way).


Brian Krueger, PhD
Columbia University Medical Center
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

I have two xbox avatars only because I can't figure out how to delete one of them.  Xbox Live only lets you have two per membership :(


Psycasm
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

Yeah, I used my drunken Wii more, not necessarily because I drink so much, but because I seem to do better when drinking, and he has better stats...


Brian Krueger, PhD
Columbia University Medical Center
Rate Post:

Like 0 Dislike

I do way better at rock band when I'm wasted.  I wonder why that is.  Maybe it's just my perception? :P

Add Comment?
Comments are closed 2 weeks after initial post.
Friends